The Supreme Court on Friday held that "Doctrine of Pleasure" under which certain authorities hold office till s/he enjoys the confidence of the President or the Governor is not absolute and unrestricted and cannot be at the authority's sweet will, whim and fancy."It is of some relevance to note that the Doctrine of Pleasure in its absolute unrestricted application does not exist in India [ Images ]. The said doctrine is severely curtailed in the case of government employment," a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan said.The court passed the order while curtailing the power of the Central government in removing Governors in the middle of five-year tenure without any valid reason.The Bench held that the court can interfere if such actions have been taken arbitrarily and the government has to explain before it."... at pleasure doctrine enables the removal of a person holding office at the pleasure of an Authority, summarily, without any [...]
